In a submission to an inquiry being held by the British Parliament the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) makes a tentative examination of the possible road safety benefits of autonomous vehicles.
It does not address any of the wider questions of telematics which are being hotly debated elsewhere.
In its submission to the inquiry being held by the House of Commons Select Committee on Science and Technology the police chiefs are tentative. ACPO limits its submission to
‘…any potential issues in relation to autonomous road vehicles and intelligent transport infrastructure in so far as it may affect the police service.’
‘The infrastructure is currently very immature in relation to car to car and car to infrastructure communication.’
ACPO spots the potential for road-safety improvements but only limits its observations to the narrow field of autonomous vehicles:
From an engineering perspective, designers see autonomous vehicles as the way in which “Vision Zero”- no collisions could be achieved, with the human error element, via the driver being removed.
This could have been an opportunity for ACPO to examine some of the wider implications – for example the rapid development of black box telematic insurance products and smartphone apps which all incorporate elements of safe driving – and safe driver coaching.
These are issues which have come to the notice of the safer driving units of some UK police forces. Vehicle crime – and associated issues – are very big drivers for telematics in Europe (Italy for example) and in Brazil.
There is also no discussion of the implications of the coming use of automatic emergency alert and assist telematics applications (eCall in the EC and similar systems) which are being explored by some police forces.
There is an implication in the submission that ACPO is open to look at the wider issues.
It notes for example the assistance telematics applications can make to accident investigations – though this too is limited to those involving (the somewhat mythical) autonomous vehicles:
Following road traffic collisions police investigators will need to access vehicle systems, independent of the vehicle manufacturer, as it may be the vehicle manufacturer who is liable if the technology is found to have failed or have been claimed by the driver to have failed. This data may be recovered voluntarily or via a court order which can be costly and time consuming. The service would therefore welcome guidance regarding the recovery of future of evidence.
Of course, the police officers could have formed the opposite conclusion – that telematics applications have the potential to provide valuable, immediate, detailed information on accidents, locations and causes and help evaluate preventative mechanism.
In conclusion says ACPO:
Overall, at this time both vehicles and infrastructure are immature with a number of issues to be considered as highlighted.
The Select Committee’s inquiry continues.
Jonathan Coe, Editor
Latest posts by Jonathan Coe, Editor (see all)
- Health warning to all insurers – don’t catch widget fatigue, it’s a epidemic with dizzying symptoms. - November 13, 2013
- Russian telematics enters new era as launch deadline approaches – time to get used to аварийный and ГЛОНАСС. - November 12, 2013
- The auto-pod catapults out of the shadows – in plan to show UK ‘demonstrably smarter’ than anyone else - November 10, 2013